Angel vs. Automag vs. Cocker – My views         

 

          Ok, so here goes my foray into this debate.  I’ve owned all 3 markers involved.

Granted not at the same time but I have shot them all.  I’ve played tournaments with

The Angel and Mag.  I’ve only played with the cocker for 6 weeks as of this writing

But I am also building a cocker too.  So I can safely say I understand all 3.

 

          I’ll give a brief overview of the markers – my opinion anyway and then try to

compare them in some way.

 

The Angel
 

 

 

 


Well, my opinion is that this is without a doubt the best marker in its class.

I love my Angel SE; my Friends who have shot it love it.  I will not sell it at any price,

Where as I would sell any of my markers, for the right price.  Not to say they are bad,

Just that this marker rocks.

 

This marker can take an average player and make him a better one.  No it won’t

Teach them how to move or snap shoot.  But its ability to easily throw paint is unmatched.

The trigger is so light and easy to pull compared to the other two markers that I can recommend

It without reservation.

 

          There is not a lot that needs or should be done to this marker.  It is out of the box

Ready to shoot.  Chrono it and go lay paint. 

 

          Upgrades!  None needed.  I have replaced the plastic pull pin with a KAPP metal one,

Put on a High Volume Chamber/Low Pressure Cell and a Shocktech bolt.   The HVC/LPR and the

Bolt are useless items.  I just did it to see if it WAS any better and to make mine look a little different.

The pull pin comes in colors too.  I just don’t like plastic on any marker.  Leave it stock get a couple

Of barrels.  Locally everyone likes the ACI.  I have it and it shoots many types of paint.

I do not think the barrel is THAT much of a factor with the Angel.  It shoots so much paint

That “accuracy” is a moot point.  This is my current Tournament marker.

 

See them here: http://www.wdp-paintball.co.uk/multi.htm

 

The Mag
 

 


          My first “good” marker was a Mag w/power feed.  I liked it.  I sold it the beginning of 2001

Because I wanted to try the cocker out.  I played the Seattle Pan-am with it and walk on with it.

It was my backup marker after I got my Angel last June.  This is a basic good walk on marker.

Around here it is a little out matched against cockers and Angels though.  It is pretty easy to work on

And fix.  Just get a spare parts kit.  You can always get a Mag working as long as you have

A spare parts kit.  Down below I get into some characteristics that make it just not tournament

Ready.  It is a good jumping point into a cocker though and in a pinch I would use one in a local

Tournament, IF I HAD TOO!

 

You can check them out here: http://www.airgun.com/index.html

 

The Autococker
 

 


Well, the Autococker is unique.  It’s a pump that has replaced the pump with pneumatics.

It can be made back into a pump.  It is a mechanical marker.  People love them or hate them.

I am uncommitted at this point.  I do see more people “fiddling” with this marker than anyone else.

I am not sure if that is what draws people to it or not.  There are a host of upgrades and things

You can do this marker.  It is highly upgradeable.  Does it need to be?  Not really.  I would change out

The plastic grips for a Benchmark or my current favorite the KAPP one.  I broke my space age

Plastic grip the first day I was playing with it.  Problem is my local field is still here on Earth and I haven’t

Had a chance to play on a zero gravity paintball field.  I say it again.  I don’t like plastic on any marker.

 

          I would say that this markers claim as “the most accurate marker available” is a little misleading.

Out of the three I would say, “It has the flattest trajectory of any marker”  (barring the flatline barrel, I haven’t shot one of those).  Now if this leads to perceived accuracy great.  There are just to many variables in

Paintball to say it’s the most accurate.

 

          Personally, I think this marker requires a good paint to barrel match.  It is a closed bolt marker.

The paintball actually sits in the barrel.  The ball detent only prevents multiple loading when the bolt

Is open when pulling the trigger.  Only for a fraction of a second and then it gets pushed into the barrel

by the bolt.  So, get a number of barrels in different bores and check it carefully with the paint you are

shooting.  I have had paintballs roll out the end of my barrel.  Not very effective in a firefight.  Not to

mention it does have an impact on the velocity of the paintballs.

 

          I am using a Smart Parts Freak system on one now. Custom Products and OTP make similar

Systems – one barrel many inserts or “choke tubes”.   Great idea.  I like it.  One Barrel different

Bores.  Get one for your Cocker and it just might be “the most accurate marker available”.

 

Visit Worr Games here: http://www.worr.com/

 

 

Comparisons

 

          The Angel

 

          Pros:

                    Shoots a lot of paint fast and easily

                    Little or no major maintenance required

                    Tournament ready out of the box

                    Worth the price of admission       

 

          Cons:

                    Need to “charge” the battery. 

Yeah they last for like 420,000 shots on LCD but my SE

only shoots about 5000 rounds +/- before it needs a charge

                    Expensive to buy for a new player

                    Shoot a lot of paint very fast – more money to play

 

          The Mag

 

          Pros:

                    Good mid range marker for walk on play

                    Easy to work on and get running

                    Cheaper of all three markers

                   

          Cons:

                    It’s ability to accurately place paint and/or throw enough of it is

Outclassed by the Autococker and Angel

                   

The Autococker

 

          Pros:

                    Flatter trajectory leads to better “aiming” and shots

                    Tournament ready marker

                    Cheaper entry into a tournament marker.

                    Upgradeable!

                    Can use less paint then an Angel

 

          Cons:

                    Very mechanical – not that this is bad.  Just seems everyone is adjusting

Or “working” on them all the time.  If you have mechanical ability or like to

Fiddle with things then ignore this comment.

                    Must have good paint to barrel match for maximum effectiveness

 

 

          Well, here is where I’ll give my opinions of how they shoot.  First off, they are all quality

markers for the most part.   If money was no object or you wanted the best there is then get an

Angel.  This is currently THE BEST MARKER out there to shoot paint.  It can shoot lots of paint. 

Lots and lots of paint.  If you want to or are going to play tournaments then this is it.

 

          Ok so you can’t afford a case of paint or two every weekend you play and you still want

To play tournaments and walk on and you can’t afford 6 markers?  Then the standard

Autococker will work just fine for you.  Get a good barrel “system” and get rid of that

Cheesy plastic grip.  A Good High Pressure Air system  (Oh by the way I’ve never shot any of

them on CO2 except the Mag) and your talking about $900 dollars with a motorized hopper.

 

          Speaking of hoppers.  I run 12 volts on the Angel and Cocker and I ran a 9v on the Mag.

I don’t think the Mag justifies a 12-volt.  If you can shoot really fast get a 12-volt.

 

So is the Mag bad.  I’m not so sure.  No it doesn’t have the prestige of the Autococker

or Angel.  It IS easy to work on.  It’s not very accurate compared to the other two but it’s cheaper.

If you just want a good marker to play walk on with and want something more than a rental

And you’ll never play Tournaments ever then go for it.  You’ll still have money to buy paint

And play and you will be playing instead of trying to get your marker to work. 

 

Accuracy/Trajectory and other such stuff. 

 

The Mag has the highest trajectory (arc) of firing.  The cocker has the “flattest” trajectory

and the Angel somewhere in between but closer to the Autococker than the Mag  (subjective observation).

Picture the Mag shooting like Artillery and the Autococker more like a rifle if you will.  I would

Put the Angel in the Machine gun range for comparison.  That is about as accurate a description I can give.

Do they all have a place?  Sure do.  Most players think of the Marker as a personal thing.

I have not heard anyone talk about the right marker for the right position.  One of the reasons I own six.

Think about it.  If you are a cover player the easiest way to cover someone is to shoot a lot of

Paint and “cover” your front man.  The Angel is the best marker to perform this.  The machine gun

Effect.  Your front players need to move fast and snipe/snap shoot.  I think the Autococker does this

Very well.  It uses less paint than an Angel so they don’t need to carry six pods; it shoots flatter so you can

Shoot at more awkward angles (being tight in a bunker) with better accuracy.

Unfortunately the Mag is only useful on medium sized wood fields (in a tournament).  It’s not as effective

On Sup-Air and small woods fields because you can’t use the trajectory to maximum effectiveness (my opinion)

Although for a back player it would work with a skilled player.  In the Pan-Am I made a great key shot

In one of the games with a Mag.  The only marker that could of done it.  A nice lob shot in a

Hole in a bunker about 6” x 12”.  I never saw the guy.  I just fired into figuring he would “pop up”.

He did.  I hit him before I even saw his head.  So the Mag could be useful in some situations.

Just not most of the time.  Nothing against it. 

 

          Back to the range and accuracy discussion.  Does one shoot farther than another one? 

not really.  I think they all pretty much shoot just as far.  Some may need more Kentucky windage

than others.  It might make you think one is better but at long range (long balling) it’s still a crapshoot.

Bounces occur with all markers at long range.  In this area I think they are all about equal.

At shorter range this is not true.  Because of the flatter trajectory of the Autococker it is thought

Of as being more accurate.  I think it’s because more people are familiar with real weapons

And how they shoot so they are more “comfortable” shooting it.  Where as the Angel is slightly

Less accurate but out ways that with its ability to put a lot of paint in the same general area

With such ease.   At close range the Mag is the least effective of the three.  It’s less accurate of the

three and the trajectory means higher (less natural) firing arc’s to hit its mark.  Again a skilled player

Can counter act these negatives.

 

 

Final Notes

 

          Well.  I own or owned them all.  For tournament play the Mag is outclassed.  It would be

(was) my backup marker (2000) but I just can’t give it the nod.  I’d go with a cheaper

basic Autococker than a tricked out Mag any day.  The Autococker has the highest entry in my

maintenance category – the Angel the least.  The Mag is a good basic marker for someone

getting into paintball on a regular basis but I’d still go with a Piranha than a Mag.  Cheaper and

just as effective.  Save you pennies for an Autococker or save your dollars for an Angel.

If moneys not as much a problem then get an Angel what are you waiting for?

 

Back to home

 

Last updated 4/2/01

 

© 2001 By Wayne Perry